librelist archives

« back to archive

packaging on mac os x 10.8.4

packaging on mac os x 10.8.4

From:
Family Weimer
Date:
2013-06-22 @ 01:28
I just installed shoes. everything is going awesome... until i tried to
package my script. the button on the window won't do anything. I tried
clicking "package" under "Shoes > package" but that crashed the app. do I
need to install something?

Re: [shoes] packaging on mac os x 10.8.4

From:
Steve Klabnik
Date:
2013-06-22 @ 03:33
If you're talking about shoes/shoes, yes, packaging on the Mac has
been broken for some time. :/

Re: [shoes] packaging on mac os x 10.8.4

From:
Family Weimer
Date:
2013-06-22 @ 03:39
is there a way to package it?


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com>wrote:

> If you're talking about shoes/shoes, yes, packaging on the Mac has
> been broken for some time. :/
>

Re: [shoes] packaging on mac os x 10.8.4

From:
Steve Klabnik
Date:
2013-06-22 @ 05:26
You can theoretically use the totally undocumented 'APP=' method.
Check out hacketyhack/hacketyhack for how it does it.


This is one of the big reasons we're switching to JRuby for Shoes 4;
packaging is a _very important_ feature that's pretty broken at the
moment :/

Re: [shoes] packaging on mac os x 10.8.4

From:
J. Kaiden
Date:
2013-06-22 @ 09:26
hi Family,

  if you use green shoes you can roll your project up into a gem...  that's
pretty close to packaging! ;)

  - j


On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com>wrote:

> You can theoretically use the totally undocumented 'APP=' method.
> Check out hacketyhack/hacketyhack for how it does it.
>
>
> This is one of the big reasons we're switching to JRuby for Shoes 4;
> packaging is a _very important_ feature that's pretty broken at the
> moment :/
>

Re: [shoes] packaging on mac os x 10.8.4

From:
Family Weimer
Date:
2013-06-23 @ 14:00
would furoshiki work? I found it on ur github projects list


On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:26 AM, J. Kaiden <jakekaiden@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi Family,
>
>   if you use green shoes you can roll your project up into a gem...
>  that's pretty close to packaging! ;)
>
>   - j
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com>wrote:
>
>> You can theoretically use the totally undocumented 'APP=' method.
>> Check out hacketyhack/hacketyhack for how it does it.
>>
>>
>> This is one of the big reasons we're switching to JRuby for Shoes 4;
>> packaging is a _very important_ feature that's pretty broken at the
>> moment :/
>>
>
>

Re: [shoes] packaging on mac os x 10.8.4

From:
Eric Watson
Date:
2013-06-23 @ 14:49
Furoshiki only works for shoes 4 :(

> On Jun 23, 2013, at 9:00, Family Weimer <kacmlweimer@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> would furoshiki work? I found it on ur github projects list
> 
> 
>> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:26 AM, J. Kaiden <jakekaiden@gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi Family,
>> 
>>   if you use green shoes you can roll your project up into a gem...  
that's pretty close to packaging! ;)
>> 
>>   - j
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com> wrote:
>>> You can theoretically use the totally undocumented 'APP=' method.
>>> Check out hacketyhack/hacketyhack for how it does it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This is one of the big reasons we're switching to JRuby for Shoes 4;
>>> packaging is a _very important_ feature that's pretty broken at the
>>> moment :/
> 

Re: [shoes] packaging on mac os x 10.8.4

From:
Family Weimer
Date:
2013-06-23 @ 15:18
i downloaded shoes 4. is it very different? I looked at the examples.


On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Eric Watson <wasnotrice@gmail.com> wrote:

> Furoshiki only works for shoes 4 :(
>
> On Jun 23, 2013, at 9:00, Family Weimer <kacmlweimer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> would furoshiki work? I found it on ur github projects list
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:26 AM, J. Kaiden <jakekaiden@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> hi Family,
>>
>>   if you use green shoes you can roll your project up into a gem...
>>  that's pretty close to packaging! ;)
>>
>>   - j
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com>wrote:
>>
>>> You can theoretically use the totally undocumented 'APP=' method.
>>> Check out hacketyhack/hacketyhack for how it does it.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is one of the big reasons we're switching to JRuby for Shoes 4;
>>> packaging is a _very important_ feature that's pretty broken at the
>>> moment :/
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [shoes] packaging on mac os x 10.8.4

From:
Davor Babic
Date:
2013-06-23 @ 17:27
It's not supposed to be. But it's still very early in its development, 
so there will be more bugs.
-- 
Davor Babic
davor@davor.se


Family Weimer wrote:
> i downloaded shoes 4. is it very different? I looked at the examples.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Eric Watson <wasnotrice@gmail.com
> <mailto:wasnotrice@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Furoshiki only works for shoes 4 :(
>
>     On Jun 23, 2013, at 9:00, Family Weimer <kacmlweimer@gmail.com
>     <mailto:kacmlweimer@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>>     would furoshiki work? I found it on ur github projects list
>>
>>
>>     On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:26 AM, J. Kaiden <jakekaiden@gmail.com
>>     <mailto:jakekaiden@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         hi Family,
>>
>>           if you use green shoes you can roll your project up into a
>>         gem...  that's pretty close to packaging! ;)
>>
>>           - j
>>
>>
>>         On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Steve Klabnik
>>         <steve@steveklabnik.com <mailto:steve@steveklabnik.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             You can theoretically use the totally undocumented 'APP='
>>             method.
>>             Check out hacketyhack/hacketyhack for how it does it.
>>
>>
>>             This is one of the big reasons we're switching to JRuby
>>             for Shoes 4;
>>             packaging is a _very important_ feature that's pretty
>>             broken at the
>>             moment :/
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [shoes] packaging on mac os x 10.8.4

From:
Family Weimer
Date:
2013-06-23 @ 19:24
I tried packaging one of the examples with shoes4 but i got several errors.


On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Davor Babic <davor@davor.se> wrote:

> It's not supposed to be. But it's still very early in its development,
> so there will be more bugs.
> --
> Davor Babic
> davor@davor.se
>
>
> Family Weimer wrote:
> > i downloaded shoes 4. is it very different? I looked at the examples.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Eric Watson <wasnotrice@gmail.com
> > <mailto:wasnotrice@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Furoshiki only works for shoes 4 :(
> >
> >     On Jun 23, 2013, at 9:00, Family Weimer <kacmlweimer@gmail.com
> >     <mailto:kacmlweimer@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >>     would furoshiki work? I found it on ur github projects list
> >>
> >>
> >>     On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:26 AM, J. Kaiden <jakekaiden@gmail.com
> >>     <mailto:jakekaiden@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>         hi Family,
> >>
> >>           if you use green shoes you can roll your project up into a
> >>         gem...  that's pretty close to packaging! ;)
> >>
> >>           - j
> >>
> >>
> >>         On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Steve Klabnik
> >>         <steve@steveklabnik.com <mailto:steve@steveklabnik.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>             You can theoretically use the totally undocumented 'APP='
> >>             method.
> >>             Check out hacketyhack/hacketyhack for how it does it.
> >>
> >>
> >>             This is one of the big reasons we're switching to JRuby
> >>             for Shoes 4;
> >>             packaging is a _very important_ feature that's pretty
> >>             broken at the
> >>             moment :/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Re: [shoes] packaging on mac os x 10.8.4

From:
Eric Watson
Date:
2013-06-23 @ 19:32
Let's see if we can get those ironed out :)

The best place to discuss bugs is on github:

https://github.com/shoes/shoes4/issues

Cheers!


On Jun 23, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Family Weimer <kacmlweimer@gmail.com> wrote:

> I tried packaging one of the examples with shoes4 but i got several errors.
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Davor Babic <davor@davor.se> wrote:
> It's not supposed to be. But it's still very early in its development,
> so there will be more bugs.
> --
> Davor Babic
> davor@davor.se
> 
> 
> Family Weimer wrote:
> > i downloaded shoes 4. is it very different? I looked at the examples.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Eric Watson <wasnotrice@gmail.com
> > <mailto:wasnotrice@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Furoshiki only works for shoes 4 :(
> >
> >     On Jun 23, 2013, at 9:00, Family Weimer <kacmlweimer@gmail.com
> >     <mailto:kacmlweimer@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >>     would furoshiki work? I found it on ur github projects list
> >>
> >>
> >>     On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:26 AM, J. Kaiden <jakekaiden@gmail.com
> >>     <mailto:jakekaiden@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>         hi Family,
> >>
> >>           if you use green shoes you can roll your project up into a
> >>         gem...  that's pretty close to packaging! ;)
> >>
> >>           - j
> >>
> >>
> >>         On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Steve Klabnik
> >>         <steve@steveklabnik.com <mailto:steve@steveklabnik.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>             You can theoretically use the totally undocumented 'APP='
> >>             method.
> >>             Check out hacketyhack/hacketyhack for how it does it.
> >>
> >>
> >>             This is one of the big reasons we're switching to JRuby
> >>             for Shoes 4;
> >>             packaging is a _very important_ feature that's pretty
> >>             broken at the
> >>             moment :/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>