librelist archives

« back to archive

Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

From:
Douglas Allen
Date:
2013-04-23 @ 02:29
oops! no go.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: kb9agt@gmail.com


Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     shoes@librelist.com

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for
the recipient domain librelist.com by mail.librelist.com. [71.19.156.177].

The error that the other server returned was:
552 5.3.4 Error: message file too big

----- Original message -----

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=JgEcaS8ifAy8ocUJp4jDLpHc7/pMODL7P6L6NsSk4MA=;
        b=RWcqqMA2x96k3hinFKSjFhNoKuYX+Py1wReJEaKCclxweMzAkTbfesyXjzbBMu1ULP

 ufnIEuyNSTn33sQ48Bh4wDou615uYbCkHyjFmeNri5dE9vTsugdvwCnDGk2V/gZ+dqQ0

 xn28/61yF5naQ9QhjyGulYEvyJnw2awa7CpoDoGIFGBA2PhRJneO2h0MY/dWlGaTdYyV

 EtHS4lm9dl0cHPKci4PLUURtoJ8bCA0fzoHGX5XceUA1qxfnBZZYrSwcoBnpucPNL5Dh

 NbopLSolBdGW53Woz0bxhlqCgb75if2AQ7ddI9hCxRi9/qs9Movsu7CG1sOc2wZJleHB
         xk+Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.196.161 with SMTP id
in1mr24305068pbc.106.1366683742628;
 Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.155.193 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAF1VWedFmA_U16KfEpPiro7_NX8OjOE9yBEXCKk=
ncE3OQrGzg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF1VWec_NV-J6QddsZyq-dD7D8HN=
dUYDmk4ywm78uHyTA00_Q@mail.gmail.com>
        <377A9118-AF2B-4965-A8B9-B0E2E44FB6AE@gmail.com>
        <CAF1VWedFmA_U16KfEpPiro7_NX8OjOE9yBEXCKk=ncE3OQrGzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:22:22 -0500
Message-ID: <
CAF1VWefEyBFtgkxO+BjGj8XE+koNdfXYyNHbP+BTBx2VxSn_Lw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [shoes] Testing Shoes4
From: Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com>
To: shoes@librelist.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=e89a8ff1c814001cc804dafddba9

See attached coverage report.


On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Eric.
> Tests run okay but there is so much data coming back that I will have to
> increase the buffer for the cmd shell or learn what the coverage report
> does. There 's two pending and two failed tests show up at the end. Would
> anyone like to see the report? Tell me what I need to do.
> Thanks. "AMD Athlon on Old Compaq with Dell XP Windows OS"
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Eric Watson <wasnotrice@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Please tell me more about testing shoes in JRuby.
>>
>> I don't have Windows, so I can't speak about Windows-specifics, but
>> here's what I can tell you about the specs in Shoes4. They are designed
to
>> be run from a Rake task (which is fine, but makes it difficult to run a
>> single file--patches welcome!). You can get a list of the rake tasks as
>> usual:
>>
>>     rake -T
>>
>> and there is a list in the README[1]. Specifically for Windows, it looks
>> like you should run this command:
>>
>>     C:\tmp\shoes4>jruby --1.9 -S rake spec
>>
>> Hope that helps!
>>
>> As a side note, I think this is a big issue, because it's a barrier for
>> you becoming involved in developing Shoes. We need to remove all of those
>> barriers...so I hope we can get your specs running! :)
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]
>>

https://github.com/shoes/shoes4/tree/1e6eeb9031dfbf908eff4275ac88a0426d5b0360#running-specs
>>
>
>

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

From:
Douglas Allen
Date:
2013-04-23 @ 02:31
Where can I post it? I have google drive. Would that be okay? I'll link it
then.


On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote:

> oops! no go.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
> Date: Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> To: kb9agt@gmail.com
>
>
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>      shoes@librelist.com
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server
> for the recipient domain librelist.com by mail.librelist.com.
> [71.19.156.177].
>
> The error that the other server returned was:
> 552 5.3.4 Error: message file too big
>
> ----- Original message -----
>
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>         d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>         h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
>          :subject:from:to:content-type;
>         bh=JgEcaS8ifAy8ocUJp4jDLpHc7/pMODL7P6L6NsSk4MA=;
>
> b=RWcqqMA2x96k3hinFKSjFhNoKuYX+Py1wReJEaKCclxweMzAkTbfesyXjzbBMu1ULP
>
>  ufnIEuyNSTn33sQ48Bh4wDou615uYbCkHyjFmeNri5dE9vTsugdvwCnDGk2V/gZ+dqQ0
>
>  xn28/61yF5naQ9QhjyGulYEvyJnw2awa7CpoDoGIFGBA2PhRJneO2h0MY/dWlGaTdYyV
>
>  EtHS4lm9dl0cHPKci4PLUURtoJ8bCA0fzoHGX5XceUA1qxfnBZZYrSwcoBnpucPNL5Dh
>
>  NbopLSolBdGW53Woz0bxhlqCgb75if2AQ7ddI9hCxRi9/qs9Movsu7CG1sOc2wZJleHB
>          xk+Q==
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Received: by 10.68.196.161 with SMTP id
> in1mr24305068pbc.106.1366683742628;
>  Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.66.155.193 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
> In-Reply-To: <CAF1VWedFmA_U16KfEpPiro7_NX8OjOE9yBEXCKk=
> ncE3OQrGzg@mail.gmail.com>
> References: <CAF1VWec_NV-J6QddsZyq-dD7D8HN=
> dUYDmk4ywm78uHyTA00_Q@mail.gmail.com>
>         <377A9118-AF2B-4965-A8B9-B0E2E44FB6AE@gmail.com>
>         <CAF1VWedFmA_U16KfEpPiro7_NX8OjOE9yBEXCKk=
> ncE3OQrGzg@mail.gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:22:22 -0500
> Message-ID: <
> CAF1VWefEyBFtgkxO+BjGj8XE+koNdfXYyNHbP+BTBx2VxSn_Lw@mail.gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [shoes] Testing Shoes4
> From: Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com>
> To: shoes@librelist.com
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=e89a8ff1c814001cc804dafddba9
>
> See attached coverage report.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Eric.
> > Tests run okay but there is so much data coming back that I will have to
> > increase the buffer for the cmd shell or learn what the coverage report
> > does. There 's two pending and two failed tests show up at the end. Would
> > anyone like to see the report? Tell me what I need to do.
> > Thanks. "AMD Athlon on Old Compaq with Dell XP Windows OS"
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Eric Watson <wasnotrice@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Please tell me more about testing shoes in JRuby.
> >>
> >> I don't have Windows, so I can't speak about Windows-specifics, but
> >> here's what I can tell you about the specs in Shoes4. They are designed
> to
> >> be run from a Rake task (which is fine, but makes it difficult to run a
> >> single file--patches welcome!). You can get a list of the rake tasks as
> >> usual:
> >>
> >>     rake -T
> >>
> >> and there is a list in the README[1]. Specifically for Windows, it looks
> >> like you should run this command:
> >>
> >>     C:\tmp\shoes4>jruby --1.9 -S rake spec
> >>
> >> Hope that helps!
> >>
> >> As a side note, I think this is a big issue, because it's a barrier for
> >> you becoming involved in developing Shoes. We need to remove all of
> those
> >> barriers...so I hope we can get your specs running! :)
> >>
> >> Eric
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> 
https://github.com/shoes/shoes4/tree/1e6eeb9031dfbf908eff4275ac88a0426d5b0360#running-specs
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

From:
Douglas Allen
Date:
2013-04-23 @ 02:44
I didn't see the link here so I'll post it here but I sent it direct to the
mailing list.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_8D886sPPUyNVI0U0tCMmY2bWc/edit?usp=sharing


On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote:

> Where can I post it? I have google drive. Would that be okay? I'll link it
> then.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> oops! no go.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
>> Date: Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM
>> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>> To: kb9agt@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>>
>>      shoes@librelist.com
>>
>> Technical details of permanent failure:
>> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server
>> for the recipient domain librelist.com by mail.librelist.com.
>> [71.19.156.177].
>>
>> The error that the other server returned was:
>> 552 5.3.4 Error: message file too big
>>
>> ----- Original message -----
>>
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>>         d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>>         h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
>>          :subject:from:to:content-type;
>>         bh=JgEcaS8ifAy8ocUJp4jDLpHc7/pMODL7P6L6NsSk4MA=;
>>
>> b=RWcqqMA2x96k3hinFKSjFhNoKuYX+Py1wReJEaKCclxweMzAkTbfesyXjzbBMu1ULP
>>
>>  ufnIEuyNSTn33sQ48Bh4wDou615uYbCkHyjFmeNri5dE9vTsugdvwCnDGk2V/gZ+dqQ0
>>
>>  xn28/61yF5naQ9QhjyGulYEvyJnw2awa7CpoDoGIFGBA2PhRJneO2h0MY/dWlGaTdYyV
>>
>>  EtHS4lm9dl0cHPKci4PLUURtoJ8bCA0fzoHGX5XceUA1qxfnBZZYrSwcoBnpucPNL5Dh
>>
>>  NbopLSolBdGW53Woz0bxhlqCgb75if2AQ7ddI9hCxRi9/qs9Movsu7CG1sOc2wZJleHB
>>          xk+Q==
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> X-Received: by 10.68.196.161 with SMTP id
>> in1mr24305068pbc.106.1366683742628;
>>  Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
>> Received: by 10.66.155.193 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:22:22 -0700
>> (PDT)
>> In-Reply-To: <CAF1VWedFmA_U16KfEpPiro7_NX8OjOE9yBEXCKk=
>> ncE3OQrGzg@mail.gmail.com>
>> References: <CAF1VWec_NV-J6QddsZyq-dD7D8HN=
>> dUYDmk4ywm78uHyTA00_Q@mail.gmail.com>
>>         <377A9118-AF2B-4965-A8B9-B0E2E44FB6AE@gmail.com>
>>         <CAF1VWedFmA_U16KfEpPiro7_NX8OjOE9yBEXCKk=
>> ncE3OQrGzg@mail.gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:22:22 -0500
>> Message-ID: <
>> CAF1VWefEyBFtgkxO+BjGj8XE+koNdfXYyNHbP+BTBx2VxSn_Lw@mail.gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [shoes] Testing Shoes4
>> From: Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com>
>> To: shoes@librelist.com
>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=e89a8ff1c814001cc804dafddba9
>>
>> See attached coverage report.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Eric.
>> > Tests run okay but there is so much data coming back that I will have to
>> > increase the buffer for the cmd shell or learn what the coverage report
>> > does. There 's two pending and two failed tests show up at the end.
>> Would
>> > anyone like to see the report? Tell me what I need to do.
>> > Thanks. "AMD Athlon on Old Compaq with Dell XP Windows OS"
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Eric Watson <wasnotrice@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Please tell me more about testing shoes in JRuby.
>> >>
>> >> I don't have Windows, so I can't speak about Windows-specifics, but
>> >> here's what I can tell you about the specs in Shoes4. They are
>> designed to
>> >> be run from a Rake task (which is fine, but makes it difficult to run a
>> >> single file--patches welcome!). You can get a list of the rake tasks as
>> >> usual:
>> >>
>> >>     rake -T
>> >>
>> >> and there is a list in the README[1]. Specifically for Windows, it
>> looks
>> >> like you should run this command:
>> >>
>> >>     C:\tmp\shoes4>jruby --1.9 -S rake spec
>> >>
>> >> Hope that helps!
>> >>
>> >> As a side note, I think this is a big issue, because it's a barrier for
>> >> you becoming involved in developing Shoes. We need to remove all of
>> those
>> >> barriers...so I hope we can get your specs running! :)
>> >>
>> >> Eric
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [1]
>> >>
>> 
https://github.com/shoes/shoes4/tree/1e6eeb9031dfbf908eff4275ac88a0426d5b0360#running-specs
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>