oops! no go.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: kb9agt@gmail.com
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
shoes@librelist.com
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for
the recipient domain librelist.com by mail.librelist.com. [71.19.156.177].
The error that the other server returned was:
552 5.3.4 Error: message file too big
----- Original message -----
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=JgEcaS8ifAy8ocUJp4jDLpHc7/pMODL7P6L6NsSk4MA=;
b=RWcqqMA2x96k3hinFKSjFhNoKuYX+Py1wReJEaKCclxweMzAkTbfesyXjzbBMu1ULP
ufnIEuyNSTn33sQ48Bh4wDou615uYbCkHyjFmeNri5dE9vTsugdvwCnDGk2V/gZ+dqQ0
xn28/61yF5naQ9QhjyGulYEvyJnw2awa7CpoDoGIFGBA2PhRJneO2h0MY/dWlGaTdYyV
EtHS4lm9dl0cHPKci4PLUURtoJ8bCA0fzoHGX5XceUA1qxfnBZZYrSwcoBnpucPNL5Dh
NbopLSolBdGW53Woz0bxhlqCgb75if2AQ7ddI9hCxRi9/qs9Movsu7CG1sOc2wZJleHB
xk+Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.196.161 with SMTP id
in1mr24305068pbc.106.1366683742628;
Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.155.193 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAF1VWedFmA_U16KfEpPiro7_NX8OjOE9yBEXCKk=
ncE3OQrGzg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF1VWec_NV-J6QddsZyq-dD7D8HN=
dUYDmk4ywm78uHyTA00_Q@mail.gmail.com>
<377A9118-AF2B-4965-A8B9-B0E2E44FB6AE@gmail.com>
<CAF1VWedFmA_U16KfEpPiro7_NX8OjOE9yBEXCKk=ncE3OQrGzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:22:22 -0500
Message-ID: <
CAF1VWefEyBFtgkxO+BjGj8XE+koNdfXYyNHbP+BTBx2VxSn_Lw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [shoes] Testing Shoes4
From: Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com>
To: shoes@librelist.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=e89a8ff1c814001cc804dafddba9
See attached coverage report.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Eric.
> Tests run okay but there is so much data coming back that I will have to
> increase the buffer for the cmd shell or learn what the coverage report
> does. There 's two pending and two failed tests show up at the end. Would
> anyone like to see the report? Tell me what I need to do.
> Thanks. "AMD Athlon on Old Compaq with Dell XP Windows OS"
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Eric Watson <wasnotrice@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Please tell me more about testing shoes in JRuby.
>>
>> I don't have Windows, so I can't speak about Windows-specifics, but
>> here's what I can tell you about the specs in Shoes4. They are designed
to
>> be run from a Rake task (which is fine, but makes it difficult to run a
>> single file--patches welcome!). You can get a list of the rake tasks as
>> usual:
>>
>> rake -T
>>
>> and there is a list in the README[1]. Specifically for Windows, it looks
>> like you should run this command:
>>
>> C:\tmp\shoes4>jruby --1.9 -S rake spec
>>
>> Hope that helps!
>>
>> As a side note, I think this is a big issue, because it's a barrier for
>> you becoming involved in developing Shoes. We need to remove all of those
>> barriers...so I hope we can get your specs running! :)
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]
>>
https://github.com/shoes/shoes4/tree/1e6eeb9031dfbf908eff4275ac88a0426d5b0360#running-specs
>>
>
>
Where can I post it? I have google drive. Would that be okay? I'll link it then. On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote: > oops! no go. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com> > Date: Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM > Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) > To: kb9agt@gmail.com > > > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > shoes@librelist.com > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server > for the recipient domain librelist.com by mail.librelist.com. > [71.19.156.177]. > > The error that the other server returned was: > 552 5.3.4 Error: message file too big > > ----- Original message ----- > > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=gmail.com; s=20120113; > h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id > :subject:from:to:content-type; > bh=JgEcaS8ifAy8ocUJp4jDLpHc7/pMODL7P6L6NsSk4MA=; > > b=RWcqqMA2x96k3hinFKSjFhNoKuYX+Py1wReJEaKCclxweMzAkTbfesyXjzbBMu1ULP > > ufnIEuyNSTn33sQ48Bh4wDou615uYbCkHyjFmeNri5dE9vTsugdvwCnDGk2V/gZ+dqQ0 > > xn28/61yF5naQ9QhjyGulYEvyJnw2awa7CpoDoGIFGBA2PhRJneO2h0MY/dWlGaTdYyV > > EtHS4lm9dl0cHPKci4PLUURtoJ8bCA0fzoHGX5XceUA1qxfnBZZYrSwcoBnpucPNL5Dh > > NbopLSolBdGW53Woz0bxhlqCgb75if2AQ7ddI9hCxRi9/qs9Movsu7CG1sOc2wZJleHB > xk+Q== > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-Received: by 10.68.196.161 with SMTP id > in1mr24305068pbc.106.1366683742628; > Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT) > Received: by 10.66.155.193 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT) > In-Reply-To: <CAF1VWedFmA_U16KfEpPiro7_NX8OjOE9yBEXCKk= > ncE3OQrGzg@mail.gmail.com> > References: <CAF1VWec_NV-J6QddsZyq-dD7D8HN= > dUYDmk4ywm78uHyTA00_Q@mail.gmail.com> > <377A9118-AF2B-4965-A8B9-B0E2E44FB6AE@gmail.com> > <CAF1VWedFmA_U16KfEpPiro7_NX8OjOE9yBEXCKk= > ncE3OQrGzg@mail.gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:22:22 -0500 > Message-ID: < > CAF1VWefEyBFtgkxO+BjGj8XE+koNdfXYyNHbP+BTBx2VxSn_Lw@mail.gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [shoes] Testing Shoes4 > From: Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> > To: shoes@librelist.com > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=e89a8ff1c814001cc804dafddba9 > > See attached coverage report. > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Eric. > > Tests run okay but there is so much data coming back that I will have to > > increase the buffer for the cmd shell or learn what the coverage report > > does. There 's two pending and two failed tests show up at the end. Would > > anyone like to see the report? Tell me what I need to do. > > Thanks. "AMD Athlon on Old Compaq with Dell XP Windows OS" > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Eric Watson <wasnotrice@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> > >> On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Please tell me more about testing shoes in JRuby. > >> > >> I don't have Windows, so I can't speak about Windows-specifics, but > >> here's what I can tell you about the specs in Shoes4. They are designed > to > >> be run from a Rake task (which is fine, but makes it difficult to run a > >> single file--patches welcome!). You can get a list of the rake tasks as > >> usual: > >> > >> rake -T > >> > >> and there is a list in the README[1]. Specifically for Windows, it looks > >> like you should run this command: > >> > >> C:\tmp\shoes4>jruby --1.9 -S rake spec > >> > >> Hope that helps! > >> > >> As a side note, I think this is a big issue, because it's a barrier for > >> you becoming involved in developing Shoes. We need to remove all of > those > >> barriers...so I hope we can get your specs running! :) > >> > >> Eric > >> > >> > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://github.com/shoes/shoes4/tree/1e6eeb9031dfbf908eff4275ac88a0426d5b0360#running-specs > >> > > > > > >
I didn't see the link here so I'll post it here but I sent it direct to the mailing list. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_8D886sPPUyNVI0U0tCMmY2bWc/edit?usp=sharing On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote: > Where can I post it? I have google drive. Would that be okay? I'll link it > then. > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote: > >> oops! no go. >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com> >> Date: Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM >> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) >> To: kb9agt@gmail.com >> >> >> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: >> >> shoes@librelist.com >> >> Technical details of permanent failure: >> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server >> for the recipient domain librelist.com by mail.librelist.com. >> [71.19.156.177]. >> >> The error that the other server returned was: >> 552 5.3.4 Error: message file too big >> >> ----- Original message ----- >> >> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; >> d=gmail.com; s=20120113; >> h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id >> :subject:from:to:content-type; >> bh=JgEcaS8ifAy8ocUJp4jDLpHc7/pMODL7P6L6NsSk4MA=; >> >> b=RWcqqMA2x96k3hinFKSjFhNoKuYX+Py1wReJEaKCclxweMzAkTbfesyXjzbBMu1ULP >> >> ufnIEuyNSTn33sQ48Bh4wDou615uYbCkHyjFmeNri5dE9vTsugdvwCnDGk2V/gZ+dqQ0 >> >> xn28/61yF5naQ9QhjyGulYEvyJnw2awa7CpoDoGIFGBA2PhRJneO2h0MY/dWlGaTdYyV >> >> EtHS4lm9dl0cHPKci4PLUURtoJ8bCA0fzoHGX5XceUA1qxfnBZZYrSwcoBnpucPNL5Dh >> >> NbopLSolBdGW53Woz0bxhlqCgb75if2AQ7ddI9hCxRi9/qs9Movsu7CG1sOc2wZJleHB >> xk+Q== >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> X-Received: by 10.68.196.161 with SMTP id >> in1mr24305068pbc.106.1366683742628; >> Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT) >> Received: by 10.66.155.193 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:22:22 -0700 >> (PDT) >> In-Reply-To: <CAF1VWedFmA_U16KfEpPiro7_NX8OjOE9yBEXCKk= >> ncE3OQrGzg@mail.gmail.com> >> References: <CAF1VWec_NV-J6QddsZyq-dD7D8HN= >> dUYDmk4ywm78uHyTA00_Q@mail.gmail.com> >> <377A9118-AF2B-4965-A8B9-B0E2E44FB6AE@gmail.com> >> <CAF1VWedFmA_U16KfEpPiro7_NX8OjOE9yBEXCKk= >> ncE3OQrGzg@mail.gmail.com> >> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:22:22 -0500 >> Message-ID: < >> CAF1VWefEyBFtgkxO+BjGj8XE+koNdfXYyNHbP+BTBx2VxSn_Lw@mail.gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: [shoes] Testing Shoes4 >> From: Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> >> To: shoes@librelist.com >> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=e89a8ff1c814001cc804dafddba9 >> >> See attached coverage report. >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Thanks Eric. >> > Tests run okay but there is so much data coming back that I will have to >> > increase the buffer for the cmd shell or learn what the coverage report >> > does. There 's two pending and two failed tests show up at the end. >> Would >> > anyone like to see the report? Tell me what I need to do. >> > Thanks. "AMD Athlon on Old Compaq with Dell XP Windows OS" >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Eric Watson <wasnotrice@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Douglas Allen <kb9agt@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Please tell me more about testing shoes in JRuby. >> >> >> >> I don't have Windows, so I can't speak about Windows-specifics, but >> >> here's what I can tell you about the specs in Shoes4. They are >> designed to >> >> be run from a Rake task (which is fine, but makes it difficult to run a >> >> single file--patches welcome!). You can get a list of the rake tasks as >> >> usual: >> >> >> >> rake -T >> >> >> >> and there is a list in the README[1]. Specifically for Windows, it >> looks >> >> like you should run this command: >> >> >> >> C:\tmp\shoes4>jruby --1.9 -S rake spec >> >> >> >> Hope that helps! >> >> >> >> As a side note, I think this is a big issue, because it's a barrier for >> >> you becoming involved in developing Shoes. We need to remove all of >> those >> >> barriers...so I hope we can get your specs running! :) >> >> >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [1] >> >> >> https://github.com/shoes/shoes4/tree/1e6eeb9031dfbf908eff4275ac88a0426d5b0360#running-specs >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >