librelist archives

« back to archive

Brown Shoes walking "on their own"

Brown Shoes walking "on their own"

From:
Peter Fitzgibbons
Date:
2012-01-06 @ 21:02
All right.

We're "on our own two feet" now.

Brown Shoes is on it's own repo at github:shoes/brown_shoes, branch
'develop'

I am working on removing of the C-Ruby cruft.  If we need a RedShoes
reference we'll have to open up a local copy and inspect.

Tobi, Ash, J.Kaiden, could you move to this repo now?

I have deleted the shoes/shoes/brown_shoes branch.
Steve, this *might* affect Travis ?

Peter Fitzgibbons
(847) 859-9550
Email: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com
IM GTalk: peter.fitzgibbons
IM AOL: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com

Re: [shoes] Brown Shoes walking "on their own"

From:
ashbb
Date:
2012-01-07 @ 07:28
Hi Peter,

> I am working on removing of the C-Ruby cruft.
Cool.
Looking forward to seeing. :)

> Tobi, Ash, J.Kaiden, could you move to this repo now?
Okay! Moved.

Meaning:
- deleted old ashbb/brown_shoes repo
- forked from shoes/brown_shoes to my repo (new ashbb/brown_shoes)
- added a new branch: porting_from_green_shoes

https://github.com/ashbb/brown_shoes/tree/porting_from_green_shoes

Thanks,
ashbb

Re: [shoes] Brown Shoes walking "on their own"

From:
Peter Fitzgibbons
Date:
2012-01-07 @ 11:49
HI Ash
Holy fork-ran-away-with-the-spoon!

So I just looked into Java-GTK <http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/> (called
Java Gnome).  Head exploding.

You're running on windows?!  Well, I may pull your latest green_shoes bits
into the brown-repo for reference/stealing.

I believe I now have 3 potential implementations for java.
Choice is good.

Peter Fitzgibbons
(847) 859-9550
Email: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com
IM GTalk: peter.fitzgibbons
IM AOL: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com

Re: [shoes] Brown Shoes walking "on their own"

From:
ashbb
Date:
2012-01-07 @ 13:01
Hi Peter,

Umm,... confusing...

java-nome is a library for Java. It means that you are coding in Java.
Right?

If so and assuming that you rewrite Green Shoes in Java with java-nome,
what's going to happen?

Green Shoes app is written in Ruby. The app runs on my web-browser???

Sorry, I don't know anything about Java. xx-P

ashbb

ps. You're running on windows?! ==> Yes, I'm using Windows 7.

Re: [shoes] Brown Shoes walking "on their own"

From:
Peter Fitzgibbons
Date:
2012-01-07 @ 20:35
I'm writing in JRuby.  So anything "Java" is in-scope.

Though I think even Java-GTK is a C-lib with a Java interface... which is a
bit against one of the goals I have for BrownShoes.. which is no C

Thoughts?
Peter Fitzgibbons
(847) 859-9550
Email: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com
IM GTalk: peter.fitzgibbons
IM AOL: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com

Re: [shoes] Brown Shoes walking "on their own"

From:
Tobias Pfeiffer
Date:
2012-01-07 @ 20:44
Hey,

yeah Java-GTK should be a C-lib with Java interface. As we already have 
a c implementation in red shoes I'm also for no C ;-)

cheers,
Tobi

On 01/07/2012 09:35 PM, Peter Fitzgibbons wrote:
> I'm writing in JRuby.  So anything "Java" is in-scope.
>
> Though I think even Java-GTK is a C-lib with a Java interface... which is a bit
> against one of the goals I have for BrownShoes.. which is no C
>
> Thoughts?
> Peter Fitzgibbons
> (847) 859-9550
> Email: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com<mailto:peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com>
> IM GTalk: peter.fitzgibbons
> IM AOL: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com<mailto:peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com>
>

Re: [shoes] Brown Shoes walking "on their own"

From:
Peter Fitzgibbons
Date:
2012-01-08 @ 04:02
Good to hear we're on the same page (no-C)

Tell me when you get a chance to look at "develop" branch.

I'm working on spec/shoes/animation_spec.rb right now, and I'll post an
update shortly with a few clean running specs and first sample working....
sorta

I appreciate all the hard work that _why, Steve, Ashb, Dan Lucraft, Tobi,
others I neglectfully can't remember... your hours on this is totally a
labor of love!

Peter Fitzgibbons
(847) 859-9550
Email: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com
IM GTalk: peter.fitzgibbons
IM AOL: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com


On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Tobias Pfeiffer <
tobias.pfeiffer@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:

> Hey,
>
> yeah Java-GTK should be a C-lib with Java interface. As we already have
> a c implementation in red shoes I'm also for no C ;-)
>
> cheers,
> Tobi
>
> On 01/07/2012 09:35 PM, Peter Fitzgibbons wrote:
> > I'm writing in JRuby.  So anything "Java" is in-scope.
> >
> > Though I think even Java-GTK is a C-lib with a Java interface... which
> is a bit
> > against one of the goals I have for BrownShoes.. which is no C
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > Peter Fitzgibbons
> > (847) 859-9550
> > Email: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com<mailto:peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com>
> > IM GTalk: peter.fitzgibbons
> > IM AOL: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com<mailto:peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com>
> >
>
>

Re: [shoes] Brown Shoes walking "on their own"

From:
Peter Fitzgibbons
Date:
2012-01-08 @ 04:12
Oh, this is a note for everyone :

On OSX, SWT has a requirement for StartOnFirstThread on the Java process.
This appears to be specific to OSX, and the only way I could get rspec to
run was to hack the ./rspec script
So you'll find specs running with ./rspec instead of the RVM installed.
Caveat Emptor.

Peter Fitzgibbons
(847) 859-9550
Email: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com
IM GTalk: peter.fitzgibbons
IM AOL: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com

Re: [shoes] Brown Shoes walking "on their own"

From:
Steve Klabnik
Date:
2012-01-06 @ 21:26
> Steve, this *might* affect Travis ?

Nope! Well, since nobody will ever push to the brown_shoes branch
again, nothing bad will happen. :)