Re: [nesta] Compiling .scss files for an art-directed page
- From:
- James Abbott
- Date:
- 2012-04-17 @ 08:19
Hi Graham,-
You haven't got any route handling code in your own app.rb file that might
> have got in there before that block got a chance to run, have you?
>
It looks like it. The file I'm trying to use as the custom stylesheet is
called literate.scss. The error message I get for the compiled .css file is
this:
Errno::ENOENT at /css/literate.css No such file or directory -
/Users/me/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p0/gems/nesta-0.9.11/views/literate.sass
The last line in the error backtrace points to this:
https://github.com/abbottjam/nesta-theme-legibilis/blob/master/app.rb#L13
That's my app.rb. I still can't see what's interfering with the execution
of this block though.
Thanks,
James
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Graham Ashton <graham@effectif.com> wrote:
> On 15 Apr 2012, at 18:28, James Abbott wrote:
>
> > I'm creating my first art-directed design with Nesta. Installed the
> plugin, created a link to the .css file from my layout.haml, and created
> the .scss file with the custom design in /views.
>
> Sounds right.
>
> > Trouble is, the app doesn't compile that .scss file into the public/css
> folder
>
> It isn't supposed to...
>
> > so the layout is effectively linking to a non-existing file.
>
> Your Nesta app should be setup to serve it at that path anyway, on the
> fly. This bit of code here will deal with it:
>
> https://github.com/gma/nesta/blob/master/lib/nesta/app.rb#L57
>
> You haven't got any route handling code in your own app.rb file that might
> have got in there before that block got a chance to run, have you?
>
> > I thought that this might be fixed by removing the /css folder so that
> Nesta doesn't look there and loads the styles from /views where the .sass /
> .scss files are. This didn't help.
>
> It'll only try and write files in public if you've got file caching
> enabled (i.e. the "cache" setting in config.yml).
>
> If you can't work it out, we'll need to see the code to get to the bottom
> of it...
>
> Graham
>
Re: [nesta] Compiling .scss files for an art-directed page
- From:
- Graham Ashton
- Date:
- 2012-04-17 @ 10:01
On 17 Apr 2012, at 09:19, James Abbott wrote:
> The last line in the error backtrace points to this:
>
> https://github.com/abbottjam/nesta-theme-legibilis/blob/master/app.rb#L13
>
> That's my app.rb.
Your block is older than the one in Nesta's default app.rb file. Yours
doesn't support scss; copy it into your app.rb file and see if it works.
If the stylesheet method isn't found you'll need to upgrade to a more
recent version of Nesta.
Re: [nesta] Compiling .scss files for an art-directed page
- From:
- James Abbott
- Date:
- 2012-04-17 @ 11:37
Ah, I see. I had suspected this was so, and tried to get around by renaming
my .scss file to .sass, but that didn't change anything.
It works now - I've updated to the latest version and re-loaded that
version's app.rb into the main folder. That involved re-pasting the body
class setting lines, though.
If I were to refactor that out of app.rb, what would be a good place to put
it? Ideally I'd like to create it as a method in a plug-in, to protect it
from side effects of future updates and also just to isolate it because
it's fairly static and doesn't change much.
/ James
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Graham Ashton <graham@effectif.com> wrote:
> On 17 Apr 2012, at 09:19, James Abbott wrote:
>
> > The last line in the error backtrace points to this:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/abbottjam/nesta-theme-legibilis/blob/master/app.rb#L13
> >
> > That's my app.rb.
>
> Your block is older than the one in Nesta's default app.rb file. Yours
> doesn't support scss; copy it into your app.rb file and see if it works. If
> the stylesheet method isn't found you'll need to upgrade to a more recent
> version of Nesta.
>
Re: [nesta] Compiling .scss files for an art-directed page
- From:
- Graham Ashton
- Date:
- 2012-04-17 @ 12:07
On 17 Apr 2012, at 12:37, James Abbott wrote:
> If I were to refactor that out of app.rb, what would be a good place to put it?
Where you've got it is the best place for it.
Re: [nesta] Compiling .scss files for an art-directed page
- From:
- James Abbott
- Date:
- 2012-04-17 @ 12:50
> Where you've got it is the best place for it.
>
I've just realized that one can achieve the same effect with adding styling
metadata to the index.mdown / .haml files in each category. Instead of
making app.rb instert body classes into layout.haml I now do this:
my-blog/some-category/index.mdown:
Layout: art
> Design: literate
>
> #Programming
>
> Interesting programming exercises and scripts.
>
In the art.haml file I then add a class for the body tag. Funny how I
didn't think of this before! Feels like so much like "the Nesta way",
instead of monkey-patching app.rb.
Cheers,
James
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Graham Ashton <graham@effectif.com> wrote:
> On 17 Apr 2012, at 12:37, James Abbott wrote:
>
> > If I were to refactor that out of app.rb, what would be a good place to
> put it?
>
> Where you've got it is the best place for it.
>