librelist archives

« back to archive

part owner

part owner

From:
Hoà V. Dinh
Date:
2013-06-22 @ 05:05
Hi all,  

I feel like to owner of part is not really used. I'm wondering if anyone 
is using it.
At least they are not used internally by mailcore2.

MCAbstractPart:
virtual AbstractMessage * message();
virtual void setMessage(AbstractMessage * message);

MCOAbstractPart:
@property (nonatomic, weak) MCOAbstractMessage * message;


I'd like to get rid of those if that's ok for everyone.

--  
Hoà V. Dinh

Re: [mailcoredev] part owner

From:
Oliver Rickard
Date:
2013-06-22 @ 05:08
Sounds good to me.  We traverse the part tree top-down, and don't use the 
message references.

--  
Oliver C. Rickard
iOS Engineer
Runway 20


On Friday, June 21, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Hoà V. Dinh wrote:

> Hi all,  
>  
> I feel like to owner of part is not really used. I'm wondering if anyone
is using it.
> At least they are not used internally by mailcore2.
>  
> MCAbstractPart:
> virtual AbstractMessage * message();
> virtual void setMessage(AbstractMessage * message);
>  
> MCOAbstractPart:
> @property (nonatomic, weak) MCOAbstractMessage * message;
>  
>  
> I'd like to get rid of those if that's ok for everyone.
>  
> --  
> Hoà V. Dinh


Re: [mailcoredev] part owner

From:
Jonathan Willing
Date:
2013-06-22 @ 05:09
I don't use it, perfectly fine with me if it is removed. 

Jonathan
Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 21, 2013, at 10:05 PM, Hoà V. Dinh <dinh.viet.hoa@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I feel like to owner of part is not really used. I'm wondering if anyone
is using it.
> At least they are not used internally by mailcore2.
> 
> MCAbstractPart:
> virtual AbstractMessage * message();
> virtual void setMessage(AbstractMessage * message);
> 
> MCOAbstractPart:
> @property (nonatomic, weak) MCOAbstractMessage * message;
> 
> I'd like to get rid of those if that's ok for everyone.
> 
> -- 
> Hoà V. Dinh
>