librelist archives

« back to archive

Upcoming bug fix release

Upcoming bug fix release

From:
Gael Varoquaux
Date:
2011-04-12 @ 21:25
Yarik brought to my attention that I had forgotten to announce the 0.5.0
release. No big deal, as he has found minor issues with it, and I am
going to cut an 0.5.1 release very soon. If you have anything that you
need fixed in the current tree, it's time to send pull requests :).

Dagg: I still have your work on my mind, but lately I have been drowning.
I'll probably find time to look at it in a week's time.

Cheers,

Gaël

Re: [joblib] Upcoming bug fix release

From:
Olivier Grisel
Date:
2011-04-12 @ 21:28
2011/4/12 Gael Varoquaux <gael.varoquaux@normalesup.org>:
> Yarik brought to my attention that I had forgotten to announce the 0.5.0
> release. No big deal, as he has found minor issues with it, and I am
> going to cut an 0.5.1 release very soon. If you have anything that you
> need fixed in the current tree, it's time to send pull requests :).
>
> Dagg: I still have your work on my mind, but lately I have been drowning.
> I'll probably find time to look at it in a week's time.

Would be great to remove this heisen-doctest:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/doctest.py", line 2152, in runTest
    raise self.failureException(self.format_failure(new.getvalue()))
AssertionError: Failed doctest test for
scikits.learn.externals.joblib.parallel.Parallel
  File 
"/home/ccomb/scikit-learn-slave/full/build/scikits/learn/externals/joblib/parallel.py",
line 139, in Parallel

----------------------------------------------------------------------
File 
"/home/ccomb/scikit-learn-slave/full/build/scikits/learn/externals/joblib/parallel.py",
line 256, in scikits.learn.externals.joblib.parallel.Parallel
Failed example:
    out = Parallel(n_jobs=2, verbose=100, pre_dispatch='1.5*n_jobs')(
                            delayed(sqrt)(i) for i in producer())
#doctest: +ELLIPSIS
Expected:
    Produced 0
    Produced 1
    Produced 2
    [Parallel(n_jobs=2)]: Done   1 out of   3+ |elapsed:   ...s
remaining:   ...s
    Produced 3
    [Parallel(n_jobs=2)]: Done ... out of   4+ |elapsed:   ...s
remaining:   ...s
    ...
Got:
    Produced 0
    [Parallel(n_jobs=2)]: Done   1 out of   1+ |elapsed:    0.0s
remaining:    0.0s
    Produced 1
    Produced 2
    Produced 3
    [Parallel(n_jobs=2)]: Done   2 out of   4+ |elapsed:    0.0s
remaining:    0.0s
    Produced 4
    [Parallel(n_jobs=2)]: Done   3 out of   5+ |elapsed:    0.0s
remaining:    0.0s
    Produced 5
    [Parallel(n_jobs=2)]: Done   5 out of   6  |elapsed:    0.0s
remaining:    0.0s

>>  raise self.failureException(self.format_failure(<StringIO.StringIO 
instance at 0x1f512d8>.getvalue()))

-- 
Olivier
http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel

Re: [joblib] Upcoming bug fix release

From:
Gael Varoquaux
Date:
2011-04-12 @ 21:38
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:28:14PM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> 2011/4/12 Gael Varoquaux <gael.varoquaux@normalesup.org>:
> > Yarik brought to my attention that I had forgotten to announce the 0.5.0
> > release. No big deal, as he has found minor issues with it, and I am
> > going to cut an 0.5.1 release very soon. If you have anything that you
> > need fixed in the current tree, it's time to send pull requests :).

> > Dagg: I still have your work on my mind, but lately I have been drowning.
> > I'll probably find time to look at it in a week's time.

> Would be great to remove this heisen-doctest:

> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/doctest.py", line 2152, in runTest
>     raise self.failureException(self.format_failure(new.getvalue()))
> AssertionError: Failed doctest test for
> scikits.learn.externals.joblib.parallel.Parallel
>   File 
"/home/ccomb/scikit-learn-slave/full/build/scikits/learn/externals/joblib/parallel.py",
> line 139, in Parallel

Wait a second, where is my time travelling machine hidding? Ah, there we
go...

How about:
https://github.com/joblib/joblib/commit/6f9cc8a60aa7240ed40097c6184cf79ab3a0a8f8
?

G

Re: [joblib] Upcoming bug fix release

From:
Olivier Grisel
Date:
2011-04-12 @ 22:06
2011/4/12 Gael Varoquaux <gael.varoquaux@normalesup.org>:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:28:14PM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>> 2011/4/12 Gael Varoquaux <gael.varoquaux@normalesup.org>:
>> > Yarik brought to my attention that I had forgotten to announce the 0.5.0
>> > release. No big deal, as he has found minor issues with it, and I am
>> > going to cut an 0.5.1 release very soon. If you have anything that you
>> > need fixed in the current tree, it's time to send pull requests :).
>
>> > Dagg: I still have your work on my mind, but lately I have been drowning.
>> > I'll probably find time to look at it in a week's time.
>
>> Would be great to remove this heisen-doctest:
>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/doctest.py", line 2152, in runTest
>>     raise self.failureException(self.format_failure(new.getvalue()))
>> AssertionError: Failed doctest test for
>> scikits.learn.externals.joblib.parallel.Parallel
>>   File 
"/home/ccomb/scikit-learn-slave/full/build/scikits/learn/externals/joblib/parallel.py",
>> line 139, in Parallel
>
> Wait a second, where is my time travelling machine hidding? Ah, there we
> go...
>
> How about:
> https://github.com/joblib/joblib/commit/6f9cc8a60aa7240ed40097c6184cf79ab3a0a8f8

Great I missed it :)

-- 
Olivier
http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel

Re: [joblib] Upcoming bug fix release

From:
Dag Sverre Seljebotn
Date:
2011-04-15 @ 13:40
On 04/12/2011 11:25 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> Yarik brought to my attention that I had forgotten to announce the 0.5.0
> release. No big deal, as he has found minor issues with it, and I am
> going to cut an 0.5.1 release very soon. If you have anything that you
> need fixed in the current tree, it's time to send pull requests :).
>
> Dagg: I still have your work on my mind, but lately I have been drowning.
> I'll probably find time to look at it in a week's time.

Please don't bother yet; I'm confident enough about the direction now 
that it'll be better to review the whole refactor when it is done. But 
I'm drowning too :-)

Dag Sverre