Re: [shoes] Shoes / BrownShoes licenses
- From:
- Peter Fitzgibbons
- Date:
- 2012-01-07 @ 04:46
Well, it turns out Why's original COPYING is identical to the MIT verse.
I'm leaving it, with an additional (C) 2011 Steve Klabnik, Peter
Fitzgibbons.
I believe it should now hold our mark, but maybe keep _why, since at
minimum our work maintains the _spirit_ of the original code, purposefully.
Thoughts?
Peter Fitzgibbons
(847) 859-9550
Email: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com
IM GTalk: peter.fitzgibbons
IM AOL: peter.fitzgibbons@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com>wrote:
> Ruby code is traditionally MIT/Ruby License dual licensed. With recent
> versions of Ruby, it's just MIT.
> Shoes is currently MIT licensed. I'd suggest keeping brown-shoes that
> way, if possible.
>
Re: [shoes] Shoes / BrownShoes licenses
- From:
- Steve Klabnik
- Date:
- 2012-01-07 @ 06:32
> I believe it should now hold our mark, but maybe keep _why, since at minimum
> our work maintains the _spirit_ of the original code, purposefully.
Yep. :)