Re: [mustache] RFC: Mustache Specification Proposal
- From:
- Chris Wanstrath
- Date:
- 2010-10-29 @ 01:14
Sweet.
http://github.com/mustache/spec
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Pieter V. <pvande@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since the question has come up on the mailing list at least once (and since
> I wanted one myself), I've put together a basic suite of test cases that
> prove certain core and edge-case behaviors for Mustache interpreters.
> These specifications exist as a set of YAML files, and presently reflect
> what I believe to be reasonable behaviors (especially w.r.t. whitespace).
> This is not a final specification.
> What I'm looking for is feedback: what's important to the Mustache
> community, what edge-cases have been missed, and where various
> implementations fall on the pass/fail continuum.
> If developer consensus can be reached, I will then propose that the
> specification be named v1.0.0 and be declared "official" (with all further
> alterations being made according to the edicts of semantic versioning
> [semver.org]).
> http://github.com/pvande/Mustache-Spec
> Implementors: Please test your implementation, and contribute new edge
> cases!
> Developers / Users: Look over the specification, propose new specs, and ask
> questions!
Re: [mustache] RFC: Mustache Specification Proposal
- From:
- Jeremy Bush
- Date:
- 2010-10-19 @ 14:22
I wholeheartedly endorse this project as a developer and framework integrator.
Jeremy
On Oct 18, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Pieter V. wrote:
> Since the question has come up on the mailing list at least once (and
since I wanted one myself), I've put together a basic suite of test cases
that prove certain core and edge-case behaviors for Mustache interpreters.
>
> These specifications exist as a set of YAML files, and presently reflect
what I believe to be reasonable behaviors (especially w.r.t. whitespace).
>
> This is not a final specification.
>
> What I'm looking for is feedback: what's important to the Mustache
community, what edge-cases have been missed, and where various
implementations fall on the pass/fail continuum.
>
> If developer consensus can be reached, I will then propose that the
specification be named v1.0.0 and be declared "official" (with all further
alterations being made according to the edicts of semantic versioning
[semver.org]).
>
> http://github.com/pvande/Mustache-Spec
>
> Implementors: Please test your implementation, and contribute new edge cases!
>
> Developers / Users: Look over the specification, propose new specs, and
ask questions!