Re: [mongrel2] Manual take out of fossil, html turned off
- From:
- Anuj Dutta
- Date:
- 2011-04-01 @ 17:59
Hello,
Is there a particular reason to use dexy? Personal choice?
Can we not use similar ruby libs like Jekyll that have everything as
markdown files? I wouldn't mind managing it.
Anuj
On 31 March 2011 17:27, Loic d'Anterroches <loic@ceondo.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2011-03-31 17:54, Zed A. Shaw wrote:
> > Well, it was just too hard to be fancy and have the HTML manual in the
> > fossil repository and still have the tickets and other user intputs safe
> > from XSS attacks. So, after failing to squash one more place I flipped
> > the main fossil repo back to no HTML in wiki, and then moved the manual
> > out of fossil.
> >
> > If you now go to the manual it's served right out of mongrel2 instead of
> > fossil, and it's the bare plain htmllatex output, nothing fancy. I'll
> > be fixing it up some more when I get in and rewrite it with Dexy.
>
> Thank you for letting me discover Dexy.
> http://www.dexy.it/
>
> I have some PHP doc to make and it has some support of PHP, which is nice.
>
> loïc
>
--
Anuj DUTTA
Re: [mongrel2] Manual take out of fossil, html turned off
- From:
- Zed A. Shaw
- Date:
- 2011-04-02 @ 18:05
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 06:59:25PM +0100, Anuj Dutta wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a particular reason to use dexy? Personal choice?
Dexy works very well with embedded code, examples, and data, and I want
to use TeX.
--
Zed A. Shaw
http://zedshaw.com/