Re: [libertyeiffel] Back to the future
- From:
- Cyril Adrian
- Date:
- 2011-09-28 @ 08:27
All the blog feels pretty old. When asked, the Eiffel reference is ETL (not
ECMA), references to SmallEiffel and SIG, dead links, Europe is "EEC"…
I have the eerie feeling of a space-time crack :-)
2011/9/28 Paolo Redaelli <paolo.redaelli@gmail.com>
> **
> I searched the web for an eventual implementation of COMPLEX for ISE/ECMA
> discovering this blog http://www.eiffellanguage.info .
> Then I read http://www.eiffellanguage.info/differences-in-se-and-ise :
>
> *What are the main differences between ISE Eiffel and SmallEiffel ? *
>
> *I’m currently using SmallEiffel -0.89 on an Amiga 1200. My University
> uses
> ISE Eiffel. *
>
> *Thanks in advance.
>
> *
>
> I check two times the date on my system. SmallEiffel -0.89? Amiga 1200? He
> seems to be stuck in 1994 or something like that.
> The blog has been actually created in 2010 and seems to be in use, but they
> keep making references to Windows NT, Tower Eiffel, giving me a subtle
> impression that it is a either a really educated joke or that some people
> are stuck in the past.
> Do you have further informations about it?
>
>
*Cyril ADRIAN **(from office)
http://www.cadrian.net/cyril *
Share with me: [image: Twitter] <http://www.twitter.com/cadbart> [image:
LinkedIn] <http://fr.linkedin.com/in/cadrian> [image: Google
Calendar]<https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=1t93vvvrdc26ee0f83p0cunj60%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=Europe/Paris>
[image:
Google Plus] <https://plus.google.com/100388810006463519079>
Contact me: [image: Google Talk] cyril.adrian@gmail.com
[image: Twitter] <http://twitter.com/cadbart> Latest tweet: [Liberty]
http://t.co/HVba0IX Cyril Adrian - useful option.
Follow @cadbart <http://twitter.com/cadbart> Reply
<http://twitter.com/?status=@cadbart%20&in_reply_to_status_id=106427146326654980&in_reply_to=cadbart>
Retweet
<http://twitter.com/?status=RT%20%40cadbart%3A%20%5BLiberty%5D%20http%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FHVba0IX%20Cyril%20Adrian%20-%20useful%20option.>
20:06 Aug-24<http://twitter.com/cadbart/statuses/106427146326654976>
Get this email app!
<http://www.wisestamp.com/apps/twitter?utm_source=extension&utm_medium=email&utm_term=twitter&utm_campaign=apps>
[image: My QR VCard]
Signature by WiseStamp.
<http://r1.wisestamp.com/r/landing?promo=15&dest=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wisestamp.com%2Femail-install%3Futm_source%3Dextension%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_campaign%3Dpromo_15>
Get
it
now!<http://r1.wisestamp.com/r/landing?promo=15&dest=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wisestamp.com%2Femail-install%3Futm_source%3Dextension%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_campaign%3Dpromo_15>
Re: [libertyeiffel] Back to the future
- From:
- Paolo Redaelli
- Date:
- 2011-09-28 @ 12:10
Il 28/09/2011 10:27, Cyril ADRIAN ha scritto:
> All the blog feels pretty old. When asked, the Eiffel reference is ETL
> (not ECMA), references to SmallEiffel and SIG, dead links, Europe is
> "EEC"…
>
> I have the eerie feeling of a space-time crack :-)
Space-time crack in the form of russian guy using eiffel.lang.comp and
google to raise money:
This glob post
<http://www.eiffellanguage.info/how-is-an-eiffel-compiler-done> labelled
28 sept 2011 is *exactly* this post
<https://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=it&q=How+is+an+Eiffel+compiler+done%3F&qt_s=Cerca+nei+gruppi>
from 26 oct 1996.
Quite surprisingly machine changed but problems seems remain the same...
it's 15 years that Meyer tries to implement SCOOP... :)
And quite surprisingly ISE seems not to have complexes.....