Re: [homebrew] MacVim snapshot 57 vs 58
- From:
- Charlie Sharpsteen
- Date:
- 2011-07-12 @ 04:44
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Max Howell <max@methylblue.com> wrote:
> Rollback I imagine. Unless you think the segfaults aren't that common.
> It's more important to have things that work. You can leave the 58 URL
> in there as an option.
>
> On 11 Jul 2011, at 18:40, Adam Vandenberg <flangy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Due to a couple of pull requests, I updated MacVim from snapshot 57 to
> > 58. This "works on my box", but I don't use/heavily customize Vim, so
> > I'm perhaps not a good test case.
> >
> > There are multiple reports of segfaults with 58 that don't happen in 57.
> >
> > So, what should we do here? Leave at 58 and users have to figure out
> > the problems on their end? Roll back to 57 which seems to be stable?
>
I say rollback---unless the new MacVim snapshot serves you breakfast and
coffee when you get up in the morning (I hear Emacs is working on this
feature). Those users who are eager for 58 and savvy enough to deal with the
segfaults should be eager and savvy enough to figure out how to adjust the
formula so it serves up what they want.
Just my two cents.
-Charlie