librelist archives

« back to archive

Which packages to include releases?

Which packages to include releases?

From:
Sebastian Benthall
Date:
2011-02-23 @ 22:32
One issue we are facing as a community is which packages we update as part
of our release process.

There are several methods of installing GeoNode.  Which of these do you use?

- Building from source
- Release bundle as tarball
- Debian package for e.g. Ubuntu
- .rpm package for e.g. CentOS
- chef-geonode scripts for cloud deployment

We would like to prioritize supporting the installation method that matters
most to users, so your feedback is important.

Thanks,

-- 
Sebastian Benthall
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org

Re: [geonode] Which packages to include releases?

From:
Spanring, Christian
Date:
2011-02-23 @ 23:02
1. building from source (due to customization)
2. also looking at chef

Christian

From: geonode@librelist.com [mailto:geonode@librelist.com] On Behalf Of 
Sebastian Benthall
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:33 PM
To: geonode@librelist.com
Subject: [geonode] Which packages to include releases?

One issue we are facing as a community is which packages we update as part
of our release process.

There are several methods of installing GeoNode.  Which of these do you use?

- Building from source
- Release bundle as tarball
- Debian package for e.g. Ubuntu
- .rpm package for e.g. CentOS
- chef-geonode scripts for cloud deployment

We would like to prioritize supporting the installation method that 
matters most to users, so your feedback is important.

Thanks,

--
Sebastian Benthall
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org

Please be advised that the Massachusetts Secretary of State considers 
e-mail to be a public record, and therefore subject to the Massachusetts 
Public Records Law, M.G.L. c. 66 § 10.

Re: [geonode] Which packages to include releases?

From:
luca.casagrande@gmail.com
Date:
2011-02-24 @ 07:52
- Building from source

Ciao
Luca

2011/2/24 Spanring, Christian <CSpanring@mapc.org>:
> 1. building from source (due to customization)
> 2. also looking at chef
>
> Christian
>
> From: geonode@librelist.com [mailto:geonode@librelist.com] On Behalf Of 
Sebastian Benthall
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:33 PM
> To: geonode@librelist.com
> Subject: [geonode] Which packages to include releases?
>
> One issue we are facing as a community is which packages we update as 
part of our release process.
>
> There are several methods of installing GeoNode.  Which of these do you use?
>
> - Building from source
> - Release bundle as tarball
> - Debian package for e.g. Ubuntu
> - .rpm package for e.g. CentOS
> - chef-geonode scripts for cloud deployment
>
> We would like to prioritize supporting the installation method that 
matters most to users, so your feedback is important.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Sebastian Benthall
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>
> Please be advised that the Massachusetts Secretary of State considers 
e-mail to be a public record, and therefore subject to the Massachusetts 
Public Records Law, M.G.L. c. 66 § 10.
>



-- 
Luca Casagrande
http://www.lucacasagrande.net
twitter: lucacasagrande

Re: [geonode] Which packages to include releases?

From:
Ariel Nunez
Date:
2011-02-23 @ 22:41
In my opinion the most useful package is the Ubuntu one.

It is easier to either get the latest source from master, build a
release tarball or clone chef-geonode and customize the scripts.

The most useful part is being able to apt-get install the latest
stable version of GeoNode. And it would be even better if we could
setup automated ubuntu packages creation and deployment for master
nightly snapshots.

My 2 colombian pesos,
Ariel.

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Sebastian Benthall <seb@opengeo.org> wrote:
> One issue we are facing as a community is which packages we update as part
> of our release process.
> There are several methods of installing GeoNode.  Which of these do you use?
> - Building from source
> - Release bundle as tarball
> - Debian package for e.g. Ubuntu
> - .rpm package for e.g. CentOS
> - chef-geonode scripts for cloud deployment
> We would like to prioritize supporting the installation method that matters
> most to users, so your feedback is important.
> Thanks,
> --
> Sebastian Benthall
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>
>

Re: [geonode] Which packages to include releases?

From:
Joe Larson
Date:
2011-02-23 @ 22:55
chef-geonode, ubuntu ~Joe
On Feb 23, 2011 2:41 PM, "Ariel Nunez" <ingenieroariel@gmail.com> wrote:
> In my opinion the most useful package is the Ubuntu one.
>
> It is easier to either get the latest source from master, build a
> release tarball or clone chef-geonode and customize the scripts.
>
> The most useful part is being able to apt-get install the latest
> stable version of GeoNode. And it would be even better if we could
> setup automated ubuntu packages creation and deployment for master
> nightly snapshots.
>
> My 2 colombian pesos,
> Ariel.
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Sebastian Benthall <seb@opengeo.org>
wrote:
>> One issue we are facing as a community is which packages we update as
part
>> of our release process.
>> There are several methods of installing GeoNode.  Which of these do you
use?
>> - Building from source
>> - Release bundle as tarball
>> - Debian package for e.g. Ubuntu
>> - .rpm package for e.g. CentOS
>> - chef-geonode scripts for cloud deployment
>> We would like to prioritize supporting the installation method that
matters
>> most to users, so your feedback is important.
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Sebastian Benthall
>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>>
>>